Challenge
A Grassroots Response to Siloed Governance
Applied Ethics Strategies:
Valuing Small DecisionsIntroduction
In a densely populated city with a rapidly growing suburban footprint, efforts to reduce transportation emissions are obstructed not by a lack of policy or widespread support, but by institutional fragmentation within local government. Different agencies—urban planning, transportation, environmental services—operate in silos, each with distinct mandates, timelines, and metrics for success. A proposal to implement a bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor supported by zoning changes for higher-density housing near new transit stations stalls as departments fail to share data, coordinate timelines, and align their priorities. Despite public pressure to reduce carbon emissions, mid-level officials report feeling disconnected from climate goals that seem outside their agencies’ remits. Small, cross-departmental actions that could improve walkability, optimize bus routes, or support bike infrastructure are overlooked in favor of isolated, large-scale initiatives. The belief persists that without sweeping reforms, minor steps are futile.
How could applied ethics address this challenge?
An NGO organizes a coalition of local educators, city officials, and student volunteers to reframe the narrative surrounding local climate action emphasizing personal agency and the power of community action. Together, they launch a campaign called “One Trip Less,” encouraging residents to walk, bike, or carpool just once a week instead of driving. Through community workshops, school programs, and local media, they highlight how small transportation decisions—made collectively—can reduce emissions over time. Testimonials from neighbors and local business owners help illustrate how these micro-actions contribute to cleaner air and more vibrant streets. By shifting the conversation away from government shortcomings toward communal participation, the campaign helps residents see themselves not as bystanders to climate policy implementation, but as essential actors in a larger movement, building momentum for broader planning initiatives in the future.
Questions to consider
Which local government departments could engage with the “One Trip Less” campaign and how can the impact of their involvement be maximized?
Which neighborhoods and communities might require more focused outreach efforts to ensure campaign outcomes are widespread?
What implementation challenges are you aware of where applied ethics strategies could help?
Submit a challenge
Sorry, your browser doesn’t supported our embedded forms. Please use this submission form instead.