Back to all Challenges

Challenge

Addressing Financial Constraints that Delay Climate Progress

System: Waste Management

Actor: City government

Introduction

A city aiming to meet its climate targets faced growing waste volumes and aging landfill infrastructure, but lacked the funding to implement a modern organics collection and composting system citywide. While leaders proposed a fee-based program to cover operating costs, concerns quickly emerged from lower-income neighborhoods that already struggled with utility burdens. Community members voiced skepticism about paying into a system they feared would roll out unevenly across the city. What began as a practical funding gap quickly became a matter of equity and trust, stalling political momentum and raising broader questions about how the costs and benefits of waste management driven by targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would be distributed.

How could applied ethics address this challenge?

Facilitating a Just and Orderly Transition

To respond, the city’s public works department worked with community representatives to co-design a phased implementation plan that explicitly addressed distributive fairness. Pilot programs were launched in historically underserved neighborhoods first, with subsidies provided through a green infrastructure equity fund. The department also established a participatory budgeting process to shape how revenue from the program would be reinvested— prioritizing local composting sites, green job creation, and educational outreach. By centering fairness in both rollout and funding mechanisms, the program was understood not as a burden, but as a shared investment in community health and climate resilience—earning broader support and unlocking additional state-level sustainability grants.

Questions to consider

How could a progressive funding model be used for citywide organics collection and composting systems?

What metrics or indicators should be tracked to evaluate the fairness and effectiveness of the phased rollout and funding approach?